Connections


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Site search

Twitter

    Recent Posts

    Categories

    Thank God for the 3.4 oz. Rule

    Comments (4)

    tsa

    I just finished traveling (back from Mexico City). I am sure there are many people who are a little more patient than I am with the security measures employed by the TSA. [tag]Traveling[/tag] anywhere requires removing my shoes, making sure that I don’t have certain sharp objects (not sure if my shaver counts), and of course, anything liquid in the amount of more than [tag]3.4 ounces[/tag] cannot be brought on my carry-on luggage. If I can, I prefer to not check anything in, but with these limitations, I would rather check them in (I wish I could check myself in), rather than be harassed by the often times rude [tag]TSA[/tag] officials.

    I imagine that there will be a day where our kids will be laughing at the way we look—taking off our shoes and surrendering our water bottles. But that day is not going to come in the near future. But for all of you apologists for the TSA and our security measures, let me tell you of my experience coming back from Mexico City. My shoes were not checked nor my liquids when I went through the security screening. The Mexican officials were happy and smiling, and at one point I wanted the security personnel to pay a little more attention to the screen than to the joke that his buddy just told him.

    Before boarding the plane, about 7 security personnel waited to check us. When my turn came, she opened my luggage, felt through, and shut it. It took her less than 10 seconds. She waived me on to board the plane. No shoes or liquids were checked. Now, they did make an announcement that I was not allowed to have any liquids above 3.4 ounces, but she did not check to make sure that I was abiding by that rule (I was).

    As I walked down to my seat, I began to wonder a few things. If security precautions are not as painstaking outside the US, are we really that much safer from those who wish us harm? If the 3.4 ounce rule is meant to curb use of certain types of make-shift weapons, couldn’t someone just bring a whole bunch of little bottles, get them checked through, and then combine all those liquids together?

    I am sure that there are plenty of smarter people who have good reason to implement the various rules. But I still think our kids will laugh at us when they look upon this era of American life.

    Related Posts:
    Further thoughts about airports
    Two less hours
    Lessons from John Wesley
    It is well with my soul
    Finance Friday 25: Giving out of poverty

    Commentary:


    Comment from Thor Kottelin April 22, 2007 at 10:01 pm

    This does happen all too often. I blogged about a similar experience at http://blog.anta.net/blog/_archives/2007/2/27/2767693.html .

    Stay safe!

    Comment from Tyler Watson April 23, 2007 at 9:17 am

    I’ve heard from travelers in Europe that the safety standards there are usually more strict than here in the US, or at least the US has caught up. Wasn’t your experience in the Middle East far more rigid than the US?

    When we went to New Zealand, I don’t think the requirements for international flights were much different than what we find in the US. The one domestic flight we took while there seemed to have security more like what we had prior to September 11.

    I know checking the shoes can seem silly, but after Richard Reid tried to ignite a fuse sticking out of his, I don’t find it to be much sweat off of my nose to take my shoes off for a minute in order to get through security.Perhaps my thought fulfills the axiom — I think it was Alexis de Tocqueville — that says of the American people that we love our freedom but at times would be willing to exchange freedom for safety.

    Comment from Eddy E April 23, 2007 at 12:11 pm

    I don’t doubt that most western countries are more or less similar in their security precautions as the US. When I traveled to India or Turkey (and more recently to Mexico) in the past five years, I did not find the security precautions to be as strict as in the US.

    Our security precautions and measures are reactionary. I may be in the minority, but I don’t find myself feeling any safer. If someone can stick a fuse in his shoe, I’m sure he/she can figure out other places to stick one. The measures are silly, inconvenient, and unnecessary.

    Interestingly, I admire Israel for the way they handle it. When I was there, they pretty much strip-searched me, and profiled me. I didn’t mind it and much of that was because of their attitude. People can criticize the airport security in Israel, but it seemed like they got the In N’ Out customer-service training. They were apologetic for the measures they were taking the whole way, and one of the agents, handled all of my paperwork so that I didn’t have to stand in any other lines while I was being searched. I felt safer and their record shows that they are safer.

    Pingback from Further thoughts about airports at Serving Bread July 7, 2007 at 8:01 am

    [...] Yes, the security people are nicer if they are not American, and yes, you are still subject to the 3.4oz rule. [...]

    Write a comment





    *