Connections


Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Site search

Twitter

    Recent Posts

    Categories

    Book Review: Radical by David Platt

    Comments (4)



    List Price: $14.99 USD
    New From: $5.69 In Stock
    Used from: $4.97 In Stock
    Release date May 4, 2010.

    A friend’s recommendation led me to pick up Radical by David Platt. The subtitle of the book–Taking back your faith from the American dream–captures Platt’s thesis and reason for writing the book. Platt, a pastor of a 4000 member congregation in Alabama, wrote the book as a reflection of his and his church’s journey to embrace a Christianity that is closer to what Jesus intended than the one formed by American culture. Platt had grown disenfranchised with how the church has evolved in the US. He writes, “I am convinced that we as Christ followers in American churches have embraced values and ideas that are not only unbiblical but that actually contradict the gospel we claim to believe.”

    Much of Platt’s convictions have emerged as he has traveled to other cultures and interacted with people from those cultures. Whether it was a trip to Uganda or China or other areas of the world, his cross-cultural interactions have given him a perspective on how our American spirituality has strayed from the core of the gospel.

    And while some of his stories of people who have abandoned (aspects) of the American dream so that they can truly follow Jesus are inspiring, his diagnosis of the failures of American spirituality and his solutions leave me wanting more.

    I agree with Platt that our spirituality in the United States has turned away from relationships and discipleship and toward entertainment and programs. I agree that we are completely insulated and isolated, and we don’t recognize the global realities that affect the rest of the world–such as wars, disease, and hunger. And though most of Platt’s evidence is anecdotal, what he sees and feels about American Spirituality is fairly common. What I would add, though, is that the struggle of most believers and communities of faith throughout history is to either conform to the world and to abandon ourselves to Christ.

    What he observes about American Spirituality is not a surprise. Scripture speaks of the young believers who struggle to live out their convictions, and perhaps what is unique about us American Christians is that we have defended our pursuit of the American Dream as being Biblical. And we have believed that the blessings of the American Dream is a result of God’s blessings showered on Americans.

    It is that belief that Platt doesn’t challenge that concerns me. Platt has boiled the gospel down to: “God loves so that I might make him known among all nations” and its derivative–God has blessed me to be a blessing to all. His stories and exhortation flow out of this understanding of the gospel. I would argue that his understanding of the gospel is very much an American view of the gospel and very much fits with the American Dream. In other words, the American Dream has shaped his theology. All of his stories come out of this theological paradigm. God has loved and blessed people and the least they can do is to go do his work. So his applications and exhortations don’t do much to challenge the American Dream. Sure there were people who have given up a portion of their profits or downsized their lifestyles for the sake of the gospel, but the mission remains fixed on what we as Americans can do for ‘those people.’ Missions is not meant to be Christian charity.

    The focus of the gospel and missions should be less about what we have to offer and more about what we need from God. Instead of going because we have been blessed, we should be going because we will be blessed. We have much to learn from the Church in the third world, and by going, we need to put ourselves in a place of weakness and humility to receive what God has for us in other contexts. God invites us into his mission not because we have been blessed but because he wants to extend a blessing to us. And it is within that framework that helps me understand Jesus when he teaches “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for the kingdom of heaven belongs to them.” (Matthew 5.3)

    This radical discipleship would change how we do church, how we do discipleship and how we do missions. And while Platt criticizes how the American church has reduced our faith to numbers–bigger being better–he does little to move us beyond that criticism. His book is filled with stories of how his radical discipleship teaching is impacting numbers. (‘Thousands went to bless the churches here. Hundreds are showing up to a prayer gathering. Millions are being given to missions. etc…”)

    Regardless of my critique of the book, I appreciate that Platt does raise a critique of the American church that is needed. I also appreciate his prescription to pursue transformation–to pray for the world, to read through the Bible, to give more, and to go overseas. I think those are helpful disciplines that focus our vision on what Jesus intended for us. Yet, they should not be the end goal of a radical Christianity.

    For those who are looking for radical discipleship, I’d recommend The Cost of Discipleship by Dietrich Bonhoeffer and The Master Plan of Evangelism by Robert Coleman. For those who are looking for inspiration in Missions, I’d recommend The New Friars by Scott Bessenecker. And for those who are looking for a transformation in their finances, I’d recommend Rich Christians in an Age of Hunger by Ron Sider.

    Near the closing pages of the book, Platt writes, “So what happens when radical obedience to Christ becomes the new normal?” While Platt has moved us toward a more radical version of Christianity, I certainly hope that his picture of obedience is not the new normal.

    Related Posts:
    Finance Friday 30: Revisiting a budget
    Book Review: Bloodlines by John Piper
    Why the empty pews?
    Quote of the day
    Book Review: The Circle of Seasons by Kimberlee Conway Ireton

    Commentary:


    Comment from Rick September 14, 2011 at 9:56 am

    I have heard of this book, but not read it; I appreciate your review. I can’t defend the book since I only know of it what you share in your review. I also do not defend the idea that “rich Americans” might occasionally condescend to help the “little people” in some other place. There are many examples of American condescension toward others, as individuals, as members of a church or ministry, and as a nation.

    But if I understand you correctly, your argument against the book is that because he boils down the gospel into (paraphrasing your words) “use what God gives us and give it to the world” is based on a consumerist American worldview? And your counterargument is that we should share the gospel because of what we get out of it, because we’ll be blessed?

    Is this really what you mean to say? If so, your argument is exactly wrong: the heart of American consumerism is about meeting our own needs, not putting others first. The heart of the gospel is putting others first, as embodied in Christ’s self-sacrificing agape love.

    I suggest that God’s covenants with Abram in Genesis is where we start to build the concept of “blessed to be a blessing;” at least that’s where God makes it explicit (we see many glimpses of it in the opening chapters of Genesis). God blessed Abram so God could use Abraham to bring the gospel to the nations (God blessed Abram to be a blessing; as Abraham’s spiritual children, we inherit the same blessing and responsibility). Of course, the ultimate blessing is Jesus Himself, which we are privileged to share with those who do not know Him.

    God’s covenant with Abram predates America by a few thousand years, and has nothing to do with a consumerist America.

    Please clarify your intent. If I could be so bold, I suspect you didn’t say what you really meant to say.

    Thanks! Rick

    Comment from Eddy E September 14, 2011 at 6:54 pm

    Thanks for your comments, asking me to clarify, and your charity in your response. I think what Platt addresses some, but not fully, is how much American consumerism and the “American Dream” has shaped how we think about the gospel, church, missions, etc… I don’t want to suggest that “blessed to be a blessing” is an American thing. However, I’m not sure if we know how to interpret what that means.

    As I read your comment and my review, I could see that I gave no room for “blessed to be a blessing” which begins with Abraham and is iterated throughout Scripture. I think part of the implication in the Matthew 28 commission is reflective of the idea that we’ve been blessed (in this case by the authority of Jesus) and we ought to go in that authority. And John in his first letter speaks about God’s love compelling us to go love.

    I agree with your reflection that our motivation for mission has to be rooted in the ways that God has first met us, loved us, blessed us, and sent us. And perhaps some of my issue with Platt is that he doesn’t quite define what “being blessed by God” means. Does it mean having economic success? It could include that. Does it mean having significant leadership? Maybe. I guess I wish Platt defined that more.

    I’m not sure I’d agree that my understanding of motivation for the gospel as “what we get out of it, because we’ll be blessed.” I look at the story of Luke 10 and the sending of the 70 and again the sending of the 12 where Jesus sent them from a place of weakness to minister to others. I look at Paul in 2 Corinthians 11 who declares that he will boast of the things that show his weakness. In other words, missions is not just an overflowing of the blessings we receive, but perhaps we go with the desire that we meet God and that our discipleship is tied up to our going. For me this is especially authenticated when we hear people testify after short term mission trips and when I read the biography of missionaries. The testimony usually goes like this, “I went to serve and bless them and I got so much more than I gave.” Maybe that’s the way it’s supposed to be. God is already at work and we get to participate in God’s mission. God is already loving and we don’t just bring Christ (and I fully believe that we do) but we also meet him on the mission field.

    Finally, a friend reminded me to understand David Platt’s context and that his book is quite the challenge for his audience. I agree. Like I said in my review, I think he raises some important questions and challenges, but there is more to be had!

    Comment from Rick September 15, 2011 at 11:41 am

    Thanks, Eddy for clarifying your position; I didn’t think you really meant what your words said. There are, unfortunately, too many who wear the name “Christian” who do think blessing means money and stuff for me. Your counter examples of folks who go on short-term trips coming back more blessed than the ones they went to serve is very common, one I have seen in many people, including my own experience. While this is one argument among many for why someone should go on a mission trip (or become involved in some other area of service), it is not the primary reason or motivation.

    For myself, I see a burning need, know that God has equipped me with spiritual gifts and a relevant set of skills and experience, and expects me to use His gifts to me (blessings, if you will), in His service, as He directs. I respond to my Lord, out of love and obedience. Then the Lord produces the fruit of blessing as by-products of my response, to those who He calls me to serve, and (usually) to me. But I don’t go for my potential blessings, I go for the blessings He will bring to others.

    For a complete discussion of the blessed to be a blessing concept, please see Steve Hawthorne’s paper “The Story of His Glory,” which I first encountered as part of the Perspectives Course, but is available as a free download from his ministry, WayMakers (waymakers.org).

    Separately, whenever and wherever there has been a community of people who follow God, it does not take long before the church begins to look and feel kind of like the culture in which that church resides. Over time, the church may eventually become indistinguishable from its surrounding culture. And as happened throughout much of Europe, the church can even disappear (except for a faithful remnant). I think much of the Church in America is in the second or third camp.

    This is where I think your critique of the book makes the most sense. Applaud the author for calling the American Church to a radical discipleship, to walk through life as if the Lord really existed and places demands on each of us. You just wish he had expressed even stronger exhortations. I agree!

    Blessings, Rick

    Comment from Jamal Jivanjee December 21, 2011 at 7:10 am

    Thanks for offering your perspective of the book ‘Radical’ by David Platt. I had a very different perspective and reaction to ‘Radical’ to offer in the review that I did that actually produced a response from someone who is from Platt’s church that was mentioned in the book! Here is the title and link to the article:

    Church Member Mentioned In David Platt’s Book ‘Radical’ Responds To My Review Of ‘Radical’ – http://goo.gl/pfXuH

    Write a comment





    *